“Holiday Adjustment” Debate Rips Open Chinese Free Speech Holes
June 10, 2010 | Filed Under Internet in China | No CommentsWho doesn’t want an extra day or two off? Sometimes, the Chinese play around with the holidays like an inexperienced driver on a manual transmission car. Sold that you can shift into higher gear all the time, the newbie yanks a 5-speed stick (in top gear) down — and engages reverse gear instead.
That’s precisely what we’ve done with our May 1 break. Bearing the hallmarks of a nominal Communist state, we’ve had May 1 off since PRC time immortal. When the higher authorities remixed the holidays so that we would get a seven-day “golden week”, May 1 was seen on the same rank of importance as the PRC’s own birthday, thereby begetting each one a full seven-day break. That was well until 2008, when the holidays were remixed; since then, May 1 is a three-day only break.
Now, the Beijing Evening News is reporting efforts to get it back again have been met with opposition from Tsinghua University professor Cai Jiming (蔡继明), who’s against the move. This immediately ignited not only fierce opposition from the Cai Jiming “talk bar” on Baidu (China’s largest home-made search engine), but mixed with the naysayers were those hurling outright abuse at Cai. Unsurprisingly, Cai’s angered by this and has threatened to sue Baidu for charges up to CNY 2.1 million.
If Tian’anmen stood as a symbol for more “freedom and democracy” in China, well, the stark naked fact is — China’s nowhere ready for that. Tolerance of dissent and multiple points of views, long a staple of established democracies and pluralistic societies, is noticeably absent in China. The simple case here that a movement to keep May Day as-is (as a three-day break instead of a “new lease on life” as a week off) has ignited this much controversy shows just how far China is from that verboten F-word: true freedom of speech. And while swearing is omnipresent on the Interwebs, escalating debates to these extremes show that the Chinese, while longing for more freedoms, are unlikely to value them (or, at that, more likely to abuse them) — in essence, giving rise to today’s sorry situation of unadulterated Internet censorship.


